Imagination: The Forbidden Fruit

نوع المستند : المقالة الأصلية

المؤلف

لا يوجد

المستخلص

 



This paper is a comparative study of the Egyptian short story ‘Worms in
the Rose Garden” by Saiwa Bakr, published in 1992, and the American story “The
Yellow Wallpaper’ by Charlotte Perkins Oilman published in 1892. Although the
two stories are separated by a hundred years, both writers address the same issue;
that of women driven to madness because of their refusal and/or inability to fit
into the “model” of woman created by their respective societies.
The two heroines are characterized by an imagination that renders them
incapable of accepting the superficial, contrived rules of social conformity, and,
consequently sets them apart from their socio-cultural environment. This isolation
forces them to take a long introspective journey into the reality of theft lives
which, eventually drives them to the borders of insanity. Imagination also places
them at odds with their social milieu as the two writers posit their protagonists
against their families; the microcosm of society.
Despite the temporal, geographical and cultural differences, both texts
illustrate women’s quest for independer~ce and individuality. The texts also discuss
imagination as a hindrance and a liability. As a hindrance, imagination is largely
responsible for the two women’s failure to integrate in theft societies and be
accepted by those around them, and, similarly, imagination becomes a liability
when it leads the two heroines into a state of insanity. Thus, a pivotal question
poses itself here: Is female nonconformity synonymous with madness? Or is it
synonymous with madness only when it threatens the violation of the rigid rules
of a long standing patriarchal social establishment where “the dynamics” of “the
social structure.., are based on a power relationship in which women’s interests aresubordinated to those of men”? (Hafez)

الكلمات الرئيسية

الموضوعات الرئيسية